Jesse Lewis is Still Alive
What is a living, breathing Jesse Lewis doing in the Obama photo? The implications are astounding. It means the entire Sandy Hook event was a diabolical hoax.
How stupid they are that they didn’t think people would see it? It’s almost like a kind of arrogance, “No one will notice. Let’s get these photos up to pull their emotional strings. It will make the President look good.” Thanks to a savvy Internet video poster, Jeremy Feit, who broke the case in the video linked, here (references), it was first noticed that this is no everyday boy standing at the President’s side. Rather, it is none other than the purportedly deceased Jesse Lewis, the one who bravely ran out of Victoria Soto’s fictional classroom and was reportedly shot dead. “If he only would have stayed put,” said his forlorn father, Neil Heslin, “but that’s my Jesse.” What a lie.
Neil Heslin is also presiding over the donations. He did say that Jesse said this would be the best Christmas ever. Was that a kind of subliminal utterance by Heslin, since, now, he and his son would be enriched by countless thousands?
The lie is now proven categorically. This is Jesse Lewis of the Sandy Hook massacre fame. Here, he is spotted in the Obama after-action pictures, taken on Sunday, December 16, 2012, two days after the event. The meeting was announced in advance and extensively publicized. Local news networks let the community know, like the Hearst mouth piece the Connecticut Post:

Then, there was this notable article by ABC’s Good Morning America:

That would have included one Jesse Lewis, son of Neil Heslin. Yet, since he is proven alive, then, these would be “lie-papers,” not newspapers.
These photos with the President were taken by the major media. They are not photoshopped; they are absolutely real and have been confirmed officially. Sources for these photos include ABC and Gawker:

In addition to the above photo and caption here is a screenshot enlargement, though low resolution, of the same pose taken from a different angle:

Yet, it is one thing to be adamant about an issue such as the recognition of Lewis by a mere photo. It is quite another when it can be proven categorically. If that can be done, this makes the entire claim of a Sandy Hook schoolyard massacre a fraud. That can surely be done by a careful analysis. Here is a crystal-clear version of a slightly younger Jesse Lewis:

The above is a certified image of Jesse Lewis. Notice the following:
- the downturned corner of the right eye, towards the outer edge
- the downward curving of the eyebrows, most dramatic on the right
- the typical straight, downward curving of the bangs
- the tendency for the eyes to quickly become narrow laterally, an almost tear drop formation
- the wide flaring of the nostrils in a lateral direction
- relatively wide bridge of the nose, especially between the eyebrows
- a slight pug tip of the nose
- gaps in the teeth between the upper incisors
- lower lip is prominently thicker than the upper, especially in the middle
- face is broader at the temples than elsewhere
- relatively low crown of the head but pointed on top just to the right of midline
- relatively bulbous ear lobes
- nearly vertical smile line on the left
- slightly protuberant chin; dimple more prominent on the left
- prominent brow (just above the top eyebrows, seemingly more prominent on the left
- a particularly obvious increase in the intensity of the discoloration under the eyes on the right in the right corner of the eye; color is a purplish-red
- tendency of the bangs to drop downward in the center of the forehead
- another obvious feature, which is the upward pointing on the crown of the head, right in the center line


As is said in Hollywood detective scenes, “It’s him; It’s him!” So, now, without doubt, the Obama child and the bullet-hole-ridden Jessie Lewis are the same. There isn’t even an iota of question otherwise.
However, just in case, let’s view the most telling feature of his face: those eyes.

Raindrops did not fall from the operatives’ faces, but, when looking into eyes such as these, countless good, decent people all over the world shed countless tears. Let them turn those emotions into righteous rage. Those tear drop eyes, highly unusual, do not lie. Nor do those congestion lesions under the eyes. Nor do those bangs or the downturned the eyebrows. Nor does the fact, and this is significant, that Jessie Lewis’ right eye is closer to the bridge of the nose than the left one, visible in both close-ups.
There is one more key, definitive feature of this individual that is indisputable. Did anyone notice? It’s the whites of the eyes. In all photos when looking straight-on Jessie Lewis has a predominance of white color (sclera) of the eyes in the left portion medial to the left iris, with a much tinier portion in the right eye (possibly natural defect, possibly a kind of astigmatism). Here is a close-up of the admitted Jesse Lewis from ‘family’ photos on the Zuckerberg site:
AMITTED JESSE LEWIS, FACEBOOK

DISGUISED (with president) JESSE LEWIS, SAID NOT TO BE HIM BY THE MOSSAD

Bingo: a 1000% match.
Obfuscation by overseas operatives?
So, what is the Zionist connection? When this was realized, that astute individuals recognized Jesse Lewis in the presidential photo-op, a cover-up ensued. This was attempted by no less than the Israeli Mossad. It was an individual named (alias) Mick West who posted, aggressively, on his Website MegaDebunk.org, the following in response to those who brought to bear Jesse’s presence with Obama. Here is the finding on Google when searching for the site:
Here is what is found when the link is clicked:

West had circled Jesse’s head for emphasis, fraudulently identifying him in this manner. This caused great confusion can caused many people to drop the issue. Of course, West provides not documentation for his source.
Here is a picture of West with caption (by this author):

The fact that he is an operative is made clear throughout his posts. Here is one telling example, the post dated January, 2013, being an attempt to run cover for the Zionist perpetration of 911:
His entire role seems to run cover for various criminal acts committed by Zionist operatives throughout the world, including those who perpetrated Sandy Hook.
Source of photo and thread: http://metabunk.org/threads/1076-Debunked-Jesse-Lewis-in-Obama-Photo-after-Sandy-Hook or http://metabunk.org/threads/1076-Debunked-Jesse-Lewis-in-Obama-Photo-after-Sandy-Hook?s=45c8ad47fde1c5bcef117f65db038a07
Is, then, Jesse’s father, Neil Heslin, one such operative? The Mossad is micro-managing his image.
It is now time for Mr. Heslin to speak the truth instead of brow-beating the world about gun rights.

He surely knows the truth about the nature of his son. According to ABC News Obama met specifically with the parents of fallen sons, who had purportedly met with Obama (see Huffington Post article, here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/16/obama-newtown-victims_n_2313177.html. In the back of the Obama photo file a person is spotted. Is this Neil Heslin hiding in the back against the wall? This man has a prominent brow and forehead creases, but appears to sport a goatee.

Did Heslin have a goatee? Did he shave it? Was that him hunkered down against the wall?

Here is the caption found at the base of the photos: “My mom would be SO proud to see President Obama holding her granddaughter. But not as proud as I am of her. http://pic.twitter.com/YDU88x3O Photo by Cristina Hassinger” Thus, no matter, he was there somewhere. Note: the comment and photo upload by Hassinger demonstrates that she is also a culprit.
Here is the article confirming the “Obama/Fathers” connection: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/16/obama-newtown-victims_n_2313177.html
Even so, despite the apparent facial hair (or shadow) do the eyes and nose lie:
Man with Obama
Heslin at the anti-gun conferenceIt’s a close call, but the distance between the eyes and the bridge of the nose are similar, as are the lines in the forehead.
Leaving no room for doubt: further analysis
Here are the primary pictures of Lewis available. Let us take a careful look to determine which ones are real and which are fake:

The above picture on the right may well be real; the lighting from the flash is uniform. There is no anatomy missing. Notice the tell-tale features found in the Obama photograph, which include the tear drop-shaped eyes, the wide upper bridge of the nose, and the downward turning of the right eye edge, and the gaps between the front and second incisors. There is also that obvious fullness of the lower lip compared to the upper and the low position of the ears. The chin and jaw lines are precisely the same. These cannot be hidden or faked and are categorical proof of the scam. Here is the picture next to the Obama one:


When compared and contrasted, it is more undeniable proof.
Who is Jesse Lewis, and who are his parents? Mr. Heslin seems real and does bear resemblance. What about his mother, Scarlet Lewis, who is also a heavy hitter for gun control. Is she really his mother? Here she is, front and center, at the Sandy Hook gun grubbing conference:

Any resemblance to Lewis? Actually, there is none. However, she could easily debunk these claims by providing evidence, like documents or even family pictures. Instead, the following is what she provided. What about the picture below? Is there any proof that Scarlet Lewis is really the mother? Could she be a grade-B actress instead garnering mere monetary gain for her acts?

This is a grotesque attempt at photoshopping. Look at the light. It is aimed directly at Ms. Lewis, straight to her face and a bit above, see the flash mark in the distance behind. There is a relection of light in her eyes, the boy’s eyes, and in both their cheeks, mouths and hair; it’s strikingly obvious. In her companion, likely her real son, the reflection can even be seen as circular reflections in his irises. What about the boy in red, purportedly Jessee? His eyes are entirely dull: there is no flash-reflection in them in the least. The face has no reflection, nor does the torso, hand, or neck. Fully contrived, the head is massive and freakish, with that typical Photoshop-induced grin. However, the greatest finding relates directly to the cut-and-paste. Look on the left relative to light shadow (cut-line): the ear is missing.
Let’s look at that finding (just now seen, as this article is being prepared) more closely:

There’s no left ear. Even the right ear is suspect. They cut a part of it off with the ‘knife.’ They also apparently touched up the congestion signs under the eyes.
Even so, is there anything in this sterile photo that bears even the slightest resemblance to Jesse Lewis:


It is truly Jesse’s head, it is just that it has been shopped in, as proven by the lack of reflection of light and the bizarre facies. Look at the eyes. One is dull and cold, while the other is light and lively.
This is also a real picture of Jesse Lewis. Notice, again, the lack of a contrived appearance, the light reflection off the hair and also near the left edge of his shirt. See, too, the tear drop-like eyes, the slight downward slant of the right eye versus the left, the larger lower lip, and the nasal flaring, all of which are unique marks, like a fingerprint.

One more time:
NATURALISTIC (natural light) SYNTHETIC (no natural light)


Notice that there is plenty of light in the foreground AND background in the real photo but only light in the background of the faked one.
Here is another freakish-appearing picture, which, right away, gives reason to call fraud. While the head was likely inserted the culprits left fewer trails, here:

This might have been added to give the impression that the women in the picture is Scarlet Lewis, celebrating his school report card. After all, in eulogizing a son, why give pictures with mere strangers instead of loving family. Yet, is this really Mrs. Lewis in the background? Let’s have a closer look:


An even clear example was found, let’s look, again:


In contrast, Lewis has low methodicalness and no angular eyebrows. It is NOT the same woman.
Then, there is this bizarre picture. There is no possibility that this is real. This is most likely a black and white photo that has been colored in. Both these images have been clearly artificially installed. It bears no resemblance to a real photograph. While there is reflections on the woman’s face, there is none on Jesse’s:

A close inspection proves the case. This is a photoshopped head:

The photoshopper’s lair has been revealed. With one excessive twist of the artifice, Jesse’s head, or, rather, installed face was given too much stretch or torque. Thus, the left corner of the mouth was raised up significantly but more incriminating is the raising up of the ear on one side, while the right ear drops abnormally low: in act, anatomically impossibly low. There are defects all around his head and face. Most dramatic is the sharp angular outcropping into the shirt, a razor-like cut. Close inspection of the left area shows a gagged, tight conformation of the shirt against the ‘neck.’ Regardless, even with a twisted neck (his neck is not, just extended), there is no way that difference in ear position could be this anomalous.
In the same picture there is one more anomaly that defies explanation, as follows:

See the anomaly? It is a thin piece of ‘membrane’, vertically straight and transparent. could be the stroke of a brush: no other explanation.
One more time looking at the ears:


Thus, twisting and turning does not cause the ear to dislocate backward and upward compared to the line angle of the other ear.
Here is another picture of Lewis. Notice the naturalness of the eyes, the glimmer (lack of dullness), the sheen of the hair, and the light striking in a natural way.

What is also consistent are Lewis’ features, which make it indisputably clear that the Jesse Lewis of real life is the same child, alive and well, with President Barack Obama on December 15, 2012.
Here is Jesse with his dad. There is nothing noticeable in this picture that doesn’t conform. The light is perfectly correct. Note, again, that prominent feature in Jesse of those eyes. That is one of the greatest give-aways proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Jesse Lewis of Obama is the same one who the world has presumed dead.

A real child, for once
Jesse Lewis clearly a real person, a child like other children, as this picture demonstrates:

Once again, no matter how many lies are told, no matter how adamantly and repetitively it is repeated in the Zionist-controlled media, there is no way Jesse Lewis could be dead if he was found alive and well a day later: and not just anywhere but, rather, standing right next to the President of the United States among full guard. The case is busted–and busted again–simply by the common people. No thanks to law enforcement.
So, Mr. Heslin must be asked, ”Where is Jesse Lewis, now?” Moreover, Scarlet Lewis, must be asked if, “Are you the real mother of Jesse Lewis, and if so, can you prove it? Moreover, if you are the real mother, why not provide real pictures instead of exclusively fakes?”
Just look at the original photo of Jesse and the one some idiots are claiming are Jesse. Look at the ears. They are NOT the same. They are NOT even close to being the same. You don't fake ears, they are not the same child. GAME OVER
ReplyDeleteIn response to 'I live in Connecticut, and I assure you it happened,' I say: I, too, live in Connecticut, and I assure you it did NOT happen, as claimed... too many 'oddities.' In fact, I have compiled many here: http://www.legitgov.org/Sandy-Hook-Shooting-Oddities --Sandy Hook Shooting 'Oddities.'
ReplyDeleteCheers,
Lori Price
www.legitgov.org
people are over reacting that aint jesse lewis jesse lewis was killld at school and had a funreal and was bureid six feet under, pus jesse had all his teeth in perfect condition before he died i know that for a fact couse i live in Newtown and i know his family and my son knew jesse..... Get a life poeple and leave us alone, we are not a hoax we wish this lying and hoax rumors will stop ... wait till somthing like this happens in your town im gona haox it all up and see how you all fell....
ReplyDeleteGOD LORD!! learn how to spell!!! AND I am another one who believes SANDY HOOK IS A STAGED EVENT. DIDN'T HAPPEN!!!!
Deleteif you live in Sandy Hook in know this kid what is your name? Without it you have 0 credibility.
DeleteYep, that's Jessie....and very much alive.
ReplyDeleteNobody thinks this is a hoax more than I do, but that is not the same kid. I saw a photo of the Licata kid during the parent interview and that's who I think is in the Obama photo.
ReplyDeleteThe kids don't even look alike and showing close-ups like that isn't convincing. It really discredits the research.
I've seen a picture of the crime scene... It really happend, unless someone paid a young boy to lay in blood.
ReplyDeleteSure.. You saw a picture of the crime scene. BS
DeleteYes. Some freak put it on an app along with other pictures of dead children, making fun of them. Saying "I love seeing dead children". I just recovered from seeing the picture, so I'm not going to check if it's still his profile picture.
Deletei just dont get why you can google colmbine school shooting pictures and see them all long, but there isnt of the inside of this place, along with that and other things. i leaning toward hoax
ReplyDeleteHow long did it take for those photos and footage from Columbine to be released? And how long has it been since Sandy Hook?
DeleteWhy don't you google this stuff? The photos and videos of columbine were released a year after the incident.
ReplyDeleteThis time it won't, though. Conveniently, (and making this even more unbelievable,) they've passed a law barring pediatric autopsy reports and crime scene photos from being released to the public. If you'd like to look it up, it's Bill #1054 in Connecticut.
DeleteOne of the very last lines of the bill reads:
"(e) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, upon the request of a parent or guardian of a child whose death was caused by an apparent homicide, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner shall not make the records of its investigation and examination of such death, including the autopsy report and other scientific findings, available to the public."
Last of all:
"Statement of Purpose:
To allow the parents of a child who was a homicide victim to request that the autopsy report not be publicly disclosed."
I don't feel that the photos here are of the same kid, sorry. Not very good evidence, IMHO. But there is some very good evidence out there.
That is definitely the same child. Notice the very slight dimple or irregularity in the right side of his smile. An extremely slight indention just to the right if his smile which can be seen in both pictures. It is unlikely his teeth were fully in. Kids lose the front teeth at 6 to 7 years old and it can take as much as a year for the adult incisors to come in. My guess would be that his teeth would be partially in and thats exactly the state if his incisors, partially in.
ReplyDeleteYou are all, bloody mad. Seriously. I've never seen a group of people work so hard to create their evidence to back their confirmation bias in my life. And to do it on the back of dead children (they really are dead, you know) is simply sick.
ReplyDeleteJust, wow.
I am 54 years young and I have been a photographer since the age of eight. The photo of "mom" and two children has two problems for me. The photo was done with a direct flash on the camera. You can see reflections of the flash on the tip of moms nose and "blue boy". Moms cheek has a reflection from the flash. Mom and Blueboy have reflections in the eyes, yet the reflection in "Jessie's" eyes is not as bright. Red boy has a harsh shadow under his chin. A harsh shadow should also be under his nose and that indent under his left eye should also have a harsh shadow. Red boy also has a very slight indication of a back light falling on his arm that is resting on mom. I do have a problem with this. I am posting Anonyous because I could not choose my Yahoo ID since it does not exist in the list and I will not register with any more web sites. Sorry about that...
ReplyDeleteI don't know much about photography but, in the mom with the two boys photo . . . She is holding a sparkler in front of her and "blue boy." "Red boy" seems to be in front of the sparkler giving him less of a flashy look while the other two get more of the sparkle since the sparkler is in front of their faces.
DeleteDesperate "truther" straw grasping, confirmation bias. It's not the same child. How about poating a picture of Brian Dennehy? with a bit of imagination you could probably pass it off as Gene Rosen!
ReplyDeleteTrampling on the graves of innocents. Grow up.
How dumb does our government think we are?? Well, guess they think we are stupid since electing a president that is not even an American Citizen. I didn't vote for Obama and nor would I ever have voted for that jackel!! Obama is desperate to push thru gun control so he doesn't have to fear assassination . Why didn't Obama hire someone from Hollywood to produce and direct Sandy Hook Hoax??, it would have been much more believable!!
ReplyDeleteStupid fucks. I'd love nothing more than "hoaxing" you with a sharpened toothbrush. If you believe this is a conspiracy, then smoke yourself. You're basing this on one similar photo and a couple of near matches. What about the other dead children and staff?
ReplyDeleteDon't bother, just kill yourself.
WTF?????
ReplyDeleteThis stuff had to be written by a seriously ill kid. hahaha. That is Emilie's Cousin in the picture.