Sandy Hook Hoax - Sandy Hook AR-15 hoax? Still no school surveillance

Tuesday, 15 January 2013 · Posted in , , , ,


Every time a school shooting takes place, one of the very first things that gets released to the media is the school surveillance footage depicting the gun and the shooter. The purpose of this is to associate the pain and anguish of the massacre to the image of a scary-looking rifle.

In mere days after the Columbine shooting in 1998, for example, the media received footage from the massacre and began playing it over and over again, hammering home the images of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold with their guns. The same is true with numerous other school shootings as you'll see below.

But with the Sandy Hook school shooting, no video footage has been released. A reasonable person has to ask the question: WHY?

You see, the release of footage of Adam Lanza murdering children with an AR-15 -- if such a thing even happened -- would strongly support the mainstream media's call for banning so-called "assault rifles." It would also:

• Amp up the emotional impact of the fear mongering being carried out by the media.

• Provide visual support for the gun-grabber's plea to ban all rifles.

• Provide a wealth of images to be used by newspapers and magazines to further demonize the image of rifles.

... and yet, for some reason, we see no surveillance footage from Sandy Hook.

Why is that?

Answer: The AR-15 appears to have been left in his car and never even used in the shooting


The real answer to all this -- and this reveals the "Big Lie" of the mainstream media -- is that the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle was left in Lanza's car.

It was never brought into the school in the first place. As a result, it was not used in the shooting.

This was openly admitted in an NBC news report that has since been scrubbed and marginalized. But NaturalNews captured the video and posted it on our own private video network which is immune from censorship:

Click here to watch the NBC News video yourself.

Here's a partial transcript of the video:

Matt Lauer: Pete Williams, our chief justice correspondent, has got some new information as well, good morning.

Pete Williams: Matt, good morning to you. This continues to be a very complex investigation, and there is a lot of contradictory information out there, but there is some new information this morning from a couple of federal officials and state officials. They say now that there were actually four handguns recovered inside the school. Not just two as we were initially told. Four handguns and apparently only handguns that were taken into the school.

We knew that Adam Lanza... also had an assault-style, AR-15 style rifle that he had taken to the school that was in the car he drove there, his mother's car. But we've been told by several officials that he left that in the car.


Adam Lanza left the AR-15 in the car

This simple fact, which was confirmed by "federal officials and state officials" has been completely scrubbed out of the mainstream media, and replaced with the "assault weapon lone gunman" theory that just happens to fit nicely with the citizen disarmament agenda being pushed by anti-American traitors like Dianne Feinstein and Joe Biden.

This is why no video footage has been released. Because the real video footage almost certainly shows HANDGUNS used in the massacre, not a rifle. There may even be other elements in the video footage that they don't want the public to see, including the possibility of multiple shooters.

But take a look at the images and video footage we normally see from other shootings:

Columbine massacre. These images were repeatedly splattered all across the mainstream media as part of the push for gun control.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Panama City school board shooting. Once again, lots of publicity about these images.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Perry Castaneda shooting at the University of Texas, Austin
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
School shooting in Rio de Janero
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Zero Day shooting on May 1, 2001

In all those shootings (and many more), video footage and still images are quickly released to the media for the purpose of blasting these images into the minds of viewers everywhere. Video is played over and over again in the media with the hopes that people will be driven into a state of total irrational fear. It's also, of course, a good way to cause copycat massacres which result in even more news ratings.

And yet with Sandy Hook, we see no video footage at all. Why is that?

Three possible explanations

Explanation #1) They are busy doctoring the video footage to insert an AR-15 into the video frame by frame. The technology to do this has existed for many years as we all saw with the movie Forrest Gump, where actor Tom Hanks was shown shaking the hand of JFK. You can see that at the :48 mark of this YouTube video.

Explanation #2) No video footage was ever taken by the school. This is absurd, as it's already on the record that the Sandy Hook school had installed a video security system to monitor anyone entering or leaving the school. In fact, it's even more interesting than that: this school security policy letter was sent to parents at the beginning of the 2012-2013 school year, and it clearly states:

...the office staff will use a visual monitoring system to allow entry. Doors will be locked at approximately 9:30 a.m. Any student arriving after that time must be walked into the building and signed in at the office...

It's quite clear that if a student approached the school carrying an AR-15 rifle, he would not have been allowed entry! The only way he could have entered the school with the security system in place was to hide handguns under his clothes. You cannot hide an AR-15 rifle in a pocket, obviously.

Explanation #3) The video footage has been seized by the government and "archived" along with the footage of the missile that struck the Pentagon during the 9/11 attacks. Where is all that video footage? It was all seized and completely hidden from public view.

14 Responses to “Sandy Hook Hoax - Sandy Hook AR-15 hoax? Still no school surveillance”

  1. My suggestion to you is that you check in with the parents of those children who were buried, then discuss whether this actually happened or not. Go to the funeral homes, do some investigation, instead of this crap. I don't care what kind of gun was used, in order to kill 26 people that day, he had to have had some kind of automatic weapon with a large clip. If he had had to stop and reload anything with a smaller clip, with as many people who were called heroes that day, someone would have managed to knock him on his butt while he was busy doing that. You are a very sick person.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kate,

    1) AR-15s are semi-automatic.
    2) Even with a neutered, non "high capacity" glock magazine, the shooter would only have to reload twice. Doesn't take long.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The two pistols recovered (controversially there were four) can each hold 16 rounds. initial reports were that over 100 rounds were fired... whether you have an AR-15 with a 30 round magazine, or mutiple pistols with 16 round magazines,he would have had to stop to reload....which by the way only takes a few seconds. I am not sure in that melee that someone would be able to "knock him on his butt" in the few seconds where he could releoad, especially if he were many feet away.

    I am not saying it didn't happen, but I am suspiscious that it happened with an assault rifle with a high capacity magaine...so why are we not being told the truth?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Columbine happened in 1999 not 1998. Get your facts straight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Facts aren't welcome here.

      Delete
  5. Be suspicious.
    -Did a mentally handi"capable" autistic child have the capacity and coordination to commit the deed himself or was he himself a victim too of the "real" perpetrators"?

    -Where is the video footage?

    -Why is the media silent on the other individual(s) detained at the scene wearing the same "uniform" as the shooter?

    -Why are people's first amendment rights being trampled on and placed in check by CT officials saying they will prosecute anyone who dares publish anything on the internet contradicting the story and Facebook deleting the accounts of anyone who publicly questions the official version of this story?

    I don't understand how the police were able to miraculously get all of the facts and evidence straight on day one and then dare anyone to contradict it. Normally this would take a few days, but through the miracle of a well rehearsed narrative on the evils of guns, you can go on tv and say anything that syncs with the current administrations agenda.

    If anything this shows that cameras, locked doors and prayers were not enough to stop a bad guy with a gun. The Marine Corps and physics taught me that you meet one force with an equal and opposing force, that will cancel out the effects of the original force...i.e. THE ONLY WAY TO STOP A BAD GUY WITH A GUN IS A GOOD GUY WITH A GUN. Why do you think we allow police to carry weapons? The universally accepted, yet sometimes untrue, idea that they are the good guys with the guns out to stop the bad guys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. love this comment. my thoughts exactly

      Delete
  6. and if video was released, you'd say i was faked.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I totally agree with you. I wanna know where the video is. I feel as if the government is hiding what really happened that day. Seems suspicious to me...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Obviously they would question it as a fake now, because they have waited so long to release it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. To say this didn't happen is an insult to the familys....If it is true and this did happen.... I have to wonder...I have seen no talk shows or such with the familys speaking out. That seems strange to me.There is a lot wrong with this story, the usual footage is not there. I have yet to see any footage of kids leaveing the school,securty vidios,or the "normal" media hype. What about neighbors that knew the kids? People who were friends of the kids, and for how long? Did they know them well, or did they just move there? Were they even there at all? I truely hope this didn't happen, it's an awfull thing,but if it didn't happen it is also an awfull thing to think our government would lie this way. The government has needed a good excuse to push gun control for a long time, what better excuse than this? Gun control is not the quick, sure fix it is being made out to be. Out of all the gun owners out there, only a very small percentage ever hurt anyone. You are more likely to get hit by a car.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. then you should of seeen the footage of the father of the little girl "emily" laughing at a press conference. Look at the pictures Obama took with the kids and they said emily was dead right? wrong. she was taking pictures with obama and her family after the shooting.

      Delete
  10. What gets me is how is it that all the Families of the victims in Sandy Hook want gun control. You are telling me not one Family member of the victims didnt say this was just a nut with a gun and still be for the 2nd Amendment and If there is why has the media not shown any of them. Speaking of political gain it sickens me more that Obama would stand up thier with the Families of the Sandy hook victims for his political push on gun laws. I mean come on.... you can reference them but to rally them all to stand up with him for his own agenda is a disgrace.

    ReplyDelete

Powered by Blogger.